For the first 5 questions, respondents were asked to answer on a scale
of 5 down to 1, 5 being agree strongly. (0) = "no answer)
For the last questions, respondents were asked to answer on a scale of
3 down to 1, 5 being agree strongly. (0) = "no answer)
|
1
|
ITP made simple would interest me. Talks too complicated.
|
|
2
|
Very hot in Fleming room. IT a problem. Enjoyed it, new therapies
to consider.
|
|
3
|
Very good, enjoyed it, very enlightening, learnt a lot. Thank you
all.
|
|
4
|
Very well organised, especially as done by volunteers.
|
|
5
|
Discussion group very helpful and informative
|
|
6
|
A long afternoon. Felt overcrowded. Discussion group better in
afternoon. Lunch needed salad.
|
|
7
|
First visit - was informative and encouraging.
|
|
8
|
Talks too technical. Would prefer more discussion groups
|
|
9
|
Very good, loads of useful information we didn’t know.
|
|
10
|
Group discussion most illuminating. Patients don’t usually
meet and it opened up discussion. Very technical lectures but learnt
up to date data.
|
|
11
|
Informative and interesting.
|
|
12
|
Lectures too technical. Less diagrams and more photographic slides
needed.
|
|
13
|
More technical information given which was good.
|
|
14
|
Thank you for hard work organising (our first) conference. Lecturers
especially approachable. Dr Stasi discussion group very helpful.
|
|
15
|
Wonderfully organised. Very helpful.
|
|
16
|
Not enough seating for lunch. Lack of glasses and plates made it
slow. Pity AV wasn’t co-ordinated beforehand. Voice saying
next slide was distracting.
|
|
17
|
More time needed for discussion groups to share experiences. Not
enough variety of food. Food not acceptable for wheat intolerant
people. Learnt a lot of info.
|
|
18
|
Far too technical. Too many graphs. Previous conventions have been
easier to understand.
|
|
19
|
Thank you for a splendid day.
|
|
20
|
Too technical. Good venue short of air. Thank you for organisation.
|
|
21
|
Congratulations to organisers.
|
|
22
|
Some talks too technical.
|
|
23
|
Wonderful organisation.
|
|
24
|
Venue too small, overcrowded. Instructions non-existent (lunch,
toilets). Difficulty in hearing questions.
|
|
25
|
Very interesting but information overload. Need fewer speakers
and extra discussion group pm. Enjoyed my day.
|
|
26
|
RCPath’s facilities not adequate. AV not satisfactory. QA
sessions very useful.
|
|
27
|
Thoroughly enjoyed it. Discussion groups very reassuring.
|
|
28
|
First visit, most informative.Liked positioning of discussion group
late morning. Good venue but cramped. Congratulations to organisers.
|
|
29
|
First one, really enjoyed it. Learnt a lot. Really enjoyed discussion
groups.
|
|
30
|
Very illuminating. Shame my mother (who has ITP) couldn’t
make it. Feel more at ease.
|
|
31
|
Given hope with new treatments to avoid steroids.
|
|
32
|
London was easy to get to.
|
|
33
|
Would have like 2 discussion groups. Too hot. Less carbohydrate
and more salad needed. Would like handouts.
|
|
34
|
More discussion groups and QA needed. Better AV technology required.
|
|
35
|
Great lectures overshadowed by technical problems and poor timings.
|
|
36
|
Well organised. Venue very convenient for me.
|
|
37
|
Extremely good. Informative, friendly, hopeful.
|
|
38
|
Excellent day. Learned of many new developments.
|
|
39
|
Thanks to organisers. Very informative. Keep up wonderful work.
|
|
40
|
Well done. Computers can go down anywhere. Worthwhile day.
|
|
41
|
Discussion group excellent, Lecture theatre very hot, Thank you
for great day
|
|
42
|
Venue not suitable for large number
|
|
43
|
Location not numbered (ie, 2); Too far from underground; Food excellent
but no space to enjoy it; Couldn't look at stalls because of
congestion; more social time needed
|
|
44
|
Difficult to fit so much in one day, you did well; Some lecturers
repeated themselves and were quite technical; more discussion time
needed to share experiences and for doctors to learn; Thank you
to ITP Support
|